We question "leadership"... of the human variety
The sol cafe seems to avoid this. We may at times be too cynical of any one leader (well I am). We may throw out good teaching to hammer through an idea ourselves, but that's what we want. We want to read the bible, pray and discuss something. And as we said earlier, we may not agree on any resolution, but we accept that as well. The point is (for me anyway) "independant thought" and being open for the Holy Spirit to guide us, as well as accepting differing opinions.
I don't think anything sol cafe does is perfect or necessarily "right," but I work on a set of ideals that seems to fit into sol better than most Christian communities. Those ideals could be fallible as well, but hopefully God's grace makes up for all that I am lacking, which I believe is much.

I would modify this to say "We question human "leadership."
I refer back to an earlier piece of the manifesto...
Yes, that's it exactly!
Is it leadership, or human leadership you question - or is your issue that of inappropriate leadership? Leadership is, it exists. Someone, or some group lead sol cafe to start. Someone, or some group of them, still provides leadership. It's not only a pattern and gift of God, it's also the way the world works. It's just that we too often screw up and then the whole thing gets tainted.
The central issue is not the leadership itself, or what form it takes, or even whether it is appropriate or not. There is leadership, absolutely.
The point is that we question it. The point is that, as a church, as a group, we don't follow blindly. The point is that we know there is the risk of it getting screwed up, so we all watch and question and, perhaps most importantly, play our part in the leadership. We don't just let someone else do it and abdicate our own responsibility in it.
Post a Comment